The Solution
EDSA ProofWhy BRT
The 7 main lines

Seven corridors.
One network.

Each BRT main line occupies one dedicated median lane — physically separated from mixed traffic, operating 24 hours. Click any line to see its rationale and connected routes.

Route codes are read digit by digit — 17 is “one-seven” (feeds L1), 100 is “one-zero-zero” (L1 tertiary). The code always tells you where the route belongs.
Why these corridors
L1 Yellow
EDSA Line
Navotas TerminalSM Mall of Asia
EDSA — extended to where it actually starts.
The Yellow Line passes through Malabon and Navotas before EDSA. Navotas Terminal is the shared terminus with L5 Green — the critical junction for commuters arriving from Cavite, Batangas, and Laguna via PITX. This is not a new idea. It is the idea that already works, done more completely.
L2 Red
Quezon Ave. Line
LTO NovalichesMetropolitan Theater
From UP to España — no transfer needed.
Commonwealth and Quezon Avenue connect northern QC communities through the UP Campus and down to España, Manila. Students and workers get a direct, uninterrupted ride. Complements MRT 7 along Commonwealth and connects into LRT 1 at the south end.
L3 Orange
C5 Line
Libis TerminalEast Service Terminal
EDSA's alter ego on the east side.
C5 connects Libis, Pasig, BGC, and Taguig — three of Metro Manila's fastest-growing business districts — yet has no dedicated transit. The Orange Line gives the east side what EDSA gives the west.
L4 Brown
Osmeña Line
P. Quirino Ave.SM Center Muntinlupa
Maximizing SLEX — south to the heart of Manila.
Osmeña Highway connects Manila City southward to the borders of Muntinlupa, maximizing the SLEX corridor. For commuters from the south, this line moves them into the heart of Manila without multiple transfers.
L5 Green
Roxas Blvd. Line
Navotas TerminalPITX
Cavite to northern Manila — along the bay.
From PITX (gateway for Cavite, Batangas, Laguna) northward along Manila Bay to Navotas. Shared terminus with L1 Yellow. For bayside communities of Manila, Navotas, and Malabon, this is the primary link to the entire network.
L6 Blue
Aurora Blvd. Line
CubaoSumulong Highway
East to Cubao — connecting Marikina, Antipolo, and Rizal.
Moves people from Marikina, Antipolo, and Rizal province into Cubao — connecting into LRT 2 and MRT 3 at Araneta Center. Effectively makes Rizal part of the Metro Manila transit network.
L7 Violet
Ortigas Ave. Line
GilmoreTaytay Rotonda Monument
Rizal to Pasig to Gilmore — the east's second path in.
Runs from Taytay Rotonda through Pasig City to Gilmore, QC. Intersects L3 Orange at C5/Ortigas and connects into L1 Yellow at Gilmore — one of the key cross-connectors in the entire network.
Why seven? Not eight? Not nine? Not six? Six-seven?

If we look up the map of Metro Manila it tells a different story at every part of it. Every barangay means another culture and even every city has a different environment. In Metro Manila, it is composed of 17 different LGU's yet we are still a single region. Obviously, there is a disparity within the seventeen and that's both obvious and understandable. Understandable in a way that each local government unit's economics varies from one another, and obvious since some cities are much larger and some are relatively much smaller in area alone.

Like any other major cities in the world, Metro Manila is composed of a well diverse community. Some communities serve campus life, college life, some areas of the cities, are defined as residential areas, where most people are expected to move-in and move-out especially during the region's rush hour. Some are also classified as business districts where most 9-5 employees are expected to go in and out.

Luckily for some, who live within a close proximity to these areas it would be naturally much convenient for them to commute, but for those who reside from the other side of Metro Manila and some who even reside outside Metro Manila, the expected travel time is real.

This is where urban planning comes in and takes its beauty. A lot of highly decorated urban planners can be commissioned to write up or even plan Metro Manila, but I guess we don't need them anymore, right? Since we can do it? I mean we have been doing it ever since the world began, might as well end the world without one, right?

Then honestly, this is where the problems start to kick-in. I'm no urban planner, and definitely a lot of them are much widely known outside Metro Manila, who can creatively do his/her interpretation of Metro Manila's movement, but since you're already reading this writing, I assume you're also curious how I ended up with the seven major routes.

One thing that I can be proud of, is that I lived the majority of my life in Metro Manila. When people go back to their provinces during holy week or christmas break, I am still here in Metro Manila as I'm a pure tagalog, both my parents are from the city. Indeed a true QCitizen, if that's the case.

And seriously, I think this is the best badge that I can show to other people, I lived here and I'm from here. I don't wanna sound like I'm bragging but I know my city, and I know my region; not to every inch of it, but surely, yes I'm familiar with it. This explains why it was easier for me to do/plan it, since I know what I'm talking about.

If I wrote that Navotas Terminal should be activated, people might seem to underestimate that call, but honestly — look at the map of Metro Manila. It sits right at the end of EDSA if you continue past the Bonifacio Shrine, aligning naturally with R10. I know R10 is indeed dangerous per se, but then again — check the map of Metro Manila. Once this line is activated, it will directly serve people of the south, like Cavite, Las Piñas, Parañaque a clear access to the North without going through EDSA, C5 and even Skyway because we are running this through Roxas Boulevard up to R10.

Again, I might sound crazy to suggest that, but in this region where we are supposed to move 14 million passengers, we have to be creative. That's the only way to do it. We have to distribute the people and filter them, that way we can honestly consume the other parts of the region.

Another wild take for some, but truly makes sense to me is the Red Line. This Line starts from Quirino Highway, and will continue to pass the infamous Commonwealth Avenue, pass through Quezon City Circle, and enter Quezon Avenue. From there, it is already a straight course, the only concern left is to where this route will actually end, if you ask me — I'll end it in front of the Metropolitan Theater. Yes, I've been into that place before, it's crazy tight there, but at the same time, it is also connected through a massive walkway towards Central Terminal, which connects the Red BRT to another LRT station, thus also means, that commuters from Fairview, who wants to either go to Cavite or South can now ride only Red Line and transfer to LRT1 — Central Terminal, that's a blessing for every commuters out there. Right?

Straightforward and easy to connect from one mode of transportation to the other. These lines aim to complement the both existing stations and also stations that are “pending” up to this day.

But honestly, I get it. It might be too much for now, but soon it will resonate to you as well.

The C5 Route too, to me this is also an obvious one. This route is something that we sleep on for the majority of time. If you check the Orange Line, it literally starts in a place where nobody gets there, and honestly it is designed that way. Isolated, far from the current supply of people, this aims so that we can distribute the movement of people.

This is why the network of bus systems plays a crucial role, as much as we only want the main lines — these feeder lines and even tertiary lines are the game changer. They are like the ones that connect and make the system complete in contrast to the current existing routes in the region today, which are mostly scattered and fragmented.

Imagine riding a BRT Line that starts in Quezon City and will pass through Pasig City's business district, and can casually drop you off either in 26th Street Stop or even in Upper McKinley Stop and you're already connected to BGC. To top it all up, this line will end up connected to Line 4 — Osmeña Line. This line on the other hand will traverse within Osmeña Highway, even up to SLEX and will end within Muntinlupa City.

This is what we lack in Metro Manila today, compared to other regions outside the country, their public transportation is connected. In our current situation, it's really hard to connect what is yet to be built.

For Line 4, this literally starts at Quirino Avenue, Manila City - where no site of possible terminals may be positioned yet, and will end also in SM Center Muntinlupa. Again, eyebrows are raised, since these two mentioned “terminals” are relatively non-existent, but at the same time, check again the map of Metro Manila.

Imagine the SLEX having a BRT Line within its median lane and will connect you to the heart of Manila City and up to Muntinlupa City, and let's not forget the other communities it will run through, Makati Central Business District, Villamor Air Base, BRT Line 3 that runs through BGC & Pasig, and even a possible transfer line to the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA), and also let’s not forget the residential side of Parañaque, and even up to Alabang Town Center.

I know it's hard to imagine how these lines will be executed, but it's much more doable than other crazy ideas like turning C5 on a one-way road during rush hour,[1][2] or even creating another elevated expressway on top of EDSA.[3]

I know these might be deemed as “wild idea” but the same goes with the current status of our public transportation, the current system is also wild in a way we let “operators” passively decide which routes to run into, and only judging it based on its “economic viability”, and not even a city wide plan to follow. It may be a wild idea but this might work.

For Line 6 and Line 7, these are lines that support people from the East side of Metro Manila. Both lines are parallel to each other, as it aims to decongest and push commuters to enter Metro Manila through BRT Lines that will link them both in Cubao and Gilmore, in Quezon City where transfer towards LRT2, MRT3, EDSA BRT and other feeder lines that plays a crucial role in moving people within the region.

This is a prime example of expanding people's options from letters E to Z. As we can promote mass public transportation, this also aims for these commuters to trust public transportation again, for the sake of efficiency and effectiveness in travel.

Again, these are not merely ‘new lines’ per se. The main difference in this plan is that they are now connected and now act as a network of bus routes and not just random routes that were approved for the sake of it being ‘economically viable’.

As I keep on saying in this writing, this is just a starting point, and not a final answer.

This may seem crazy but let's also ask ourselves, what other options are still available for us, if we really want to improve our public transportation, specifically in terms of our short-term planning?

Honestly, I can just write all these without even attributing an alternate plan/solution, right? But what makes those words new if I will not float an alternate idea?

Every Juan can clamor for better public transportation, every Juan can just point out what is wrong in the system, and honestly, it's the easiest job in the world — spreading frustrations about how terrible public transportation we have. But that's not me, I'd rather come up with a wild idea in bettering public transportation as this is the only way to spark conversation that can hopefully, change the real situation in our region.

References

[1] GPI Engineers Inc. — EDSA & C5 One-Way Scheme. In August 2019, GPI Engineers proposed converting EDSA into a one-way southbound highway and C5 into a one-way northbound thoroughfare, a plan originally submitted to the Office of the President as early as 2016. President Fernando Guevara estimated average speeds could reach 40 km/h, though MMDA traffic manager Bong Nebrija cautioned the scheme would require significant engineering intervention and franchise rerouting. Via AutoIndustriya.com: autoindustriya.com

[2] Philippine Daily Inquirer described the same proposal as “extreme,” noting it was based on several years of research by GPI Engineers. UP Planning and Development Research Foundation executive director Primitivo Cal acknowledged the proposal was worth testing but cautioned that unlike New York's complementary one-way grid, Metro Manila's road network is not grid-type and EDSA and C5 are too far apart to serve similar travel patterns. Via Philippine Daily Inquirer: newsinfo.inquirer.net

[3] San Miguel Corporation — Elevated EDSA Expressway Proposal. In October 2019, SMC president and COO Ramon Ang announced the company was projecting to spend at least $3 billion for a proposed 10-lane elevated expressway along EDSA from Macapagal Avenue to Balintawak, discusssed with the Department of Transportation. Based on a 38-kilometer elevated steel expressway in Jakarta, it was estimated to be completable within 24 to 30 months if approved. A transport economist from AltMobility warned the project could worsen traffic by encouraging more private car use, noting private cars already take up 80 percent of Metro Manila's main thoroughfares. Via Philippine Star: philstar.com

← EDSA ProofNext: Why BRT →

This proposal is a starting point, not a final answer.

All routes, corridors, and line designations are proposals subject to revision. Routes may be added, modified, or removed depending on actual commuter demand, road conditions, right-of-way constraints, and the evolving needs of Metro Manila's residents.

This plan was built from observation, research, and citizen-level analysis — not from engineering surveys or official feasibility studies. Any actual implementation would require rigorous technical study, public consultation, and formal planning processes.

For public discussion and advocacy only. Not for sale. Not for political use. Version 4.1 — June 2026.