The Issue
The ProblemLTFRB
Figure 1.1 — The transportation hierarchy
Rail System | LRT 1, LRT 2, MRT 3, MRT 7, PNRBus System | City Buses, Provincial BusesUV Express, JeepneyTNVS Cars, Taxi, Private VehiclesTricycle, Motorcycle, Habal-habalBike, WalkWidest = highest people-carrying capacity per unit of road

Metro Manila's roads are allocated upside-down.

The inverted pyramid shows the modes that carry the most people at the top — rail, then buses. At the narrowest tip: the individual pedestrian or cyclist.

Today, Metro Manila allocates its roads in reverse. Private vehicles — which sit in the middle tiers — occupy the vast majority of road width. Rail and bus, the top two tiers, are squeezed into what remains.

MBT does not propose eliminating private vehicles. It proposes correcting the allocation — giving the highest-capacity modes the road priority they need to actually function at capacity. One BRT lane moves more people than four car lanes.

72%
of road traffic is private vehicles
30%
of person-km traveled by car
← The ProblemNext: LTFRB →

This proposal is a starting point, not a final answer.

All routes, corridors, and line designations are proposals subject to revision. Routes may be added, modified, or removed depending on actual commuter demand, road conditions, right-of-way constraints, and the evolving needs of Metro Manila's residents.

This plan was built from observation, research, and citizen-level analysis — not from engineering surveys or official feasibility studies. Any actual implementation would require rigorous technical study, public consultation, and formal planning processes.

For research and advocacy purposes only. Not for sale. Not for political use. Version 4 — May 2026.